Archive for Cancer research

How do genes get their names?

Chinese scientists recently found a gene that encourages the growth of a form of lung cancer by switching on a circuit that includes a gene called sonic hedgehog. How do genes get their names?

When a scientist discovers a new human gene, he or she submits a proposed name to the Human Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC), an international panel of researchers with exclusive authority over this area. Guidelines were established in 1979 by the HGNC and have been updated periodically. (The HGNC itself operates under the auspices of the Human Genome Organization, an international association of scientists involved in human genetics.)

Although the rules are fairly lengthy, they basically require that names be concise and convey the character or function of the gene without trying to describe everything known about it. Despite the call for brevity, some names are rather unwieldy – ATP-binding cassette, sub-family A (ABC1), member 1 is an example. As a result, many genes are better known by their acronym or symbol: the symbol for the above-mentioned gene is ABCA1. Symbols are not permitted to be offensive, confusing, or spell actual words.

Even with these rules, gene nomenclature can be confusing. Sometimes, the names bestowed by the HGNC have little meaning for researchers in the field, who continue to use genes’ more familiar names. The gene officially dubbed Smarcb1, for example, also goes by the symbols Snf5, INI1, and Baf47. Even TP53, one of the most “famous” genes for its role as a tumor-suppressor, is best known by its nickname, P53.

However, the rules governing the names of genes for other (non-human) organisms are somewhat looser, allowing scientists to indulge their sense of whimsy. Fruit flies, for example, have the genes tinman and tribbles, while zebrafish boast the genes backstroke, einstein, and tiggywinkle hedgehog.

Share

Cancer research updates from AACR

The American Association for Cancer Research recently held its annual meeting in Chicago. Dr. Loren Walensky of Dana-Farber/Children’s Hospital Cancer Center talks about some of the highlights, including personalized medicine and a new grant that’s helping his team develop new technology to target cancer.

Share

Counting cells at lightning speed

At many supermarkets, you can dump a pocketful of change into a machine that rapidly counts your coins, sorting them into pennies, nickels, dimes, and quarters and computing the total amount.

Imagine something similar in a research lab. In the past, cells had to be manually studied and counted under a microscope. But the development of flow cytometry technology, beginning in the 1960s and continually improving, has brought automation to counting and sorting human cells that’s reminiscent of the coin machine.

Flow cytometry today is routinely used in medical diagnosis of certain cancers, like lymphomas and leukemias, and as a powerful research tool for studying a host of different cell types and their interactions with drugs or the immune system.

“Investigators may be trying to look at a certain kind of cancer cell or immune system cell,” said Wayne Green, PhD, director of Dana-Farber’s Flow Cytometry Core Facility. “The analyzers can count the members of a certain subpopulation of cells, and then cull them so they can be grown in laboratory culture or used in gene expression studies.” Read more

Share

Men unite to cure women’s cancers

For most people, getting involved with a cause means thinking about what type of organization they’d like to support. But this is a story about what happens when a cause selects you – taps you on the shoulder and asks you to engage in battle.

It began in 1998 when my wife Amy, then 40, was diagnosed with late-stage ovarian cancer. Our two daughters were 5 years and 15 months old. Amy battled for 15 months, and died in 1999. Like many spouses of women who die of cancer too young, my next few years were all about balancing the family boat.

Fast forward to three years later, when I met my current wife, Ruth. We married in 2005 and Ruth adopted my daughters.

Just one year later, Ruth’s mother, Mildred Moorman, was diagnosed with late-stage ovarian cancer and was treated at Dana-Farber by Dr. Ursula Matulonis. (She died earlier this year.) I had the opportunity to share our family’s story at a meeting of the Susan F. Smith Center for Women’s Cancers Executive Council at Dana-Farber.

Always a strong supporter of cancer research, I wanted to do more; to find people like me. Read more

Share

Alcohol and breast cancer: What’s the risk?

For many women who enjoy a glass of wine, research showing that relatively small amounts of alcohol can raise their risk of breast cancer are disconcerting, to say the least. And confusing, too.

How much drinking is OK? Isn’t a glass of red wine a day good for your heart — and couldn’t that be more important?

In the past five or 10 years, knowledge about alcohol and breast cancer has been changing as studies produce new results and are publicized, sometimes over-dramatically, in the media. At the same time, there’s growing evidence that moderate drinking can be healthy for the heart.
Read more

Share

Specialists recommend regular colonoscopies

If you’re over 50, have you been screened for colorectal cancer?  If not, the month of March would be a great time to talk about screening with your doctor.

Colorectal cancer is the third leading cause of cancer in men and women in theUnited States. In 2012, an estimated 141,210 people will be diagnosed with colorectal cancer and 49,380 will die of the disease.

But it’s also a very curable cancer when it’s caught early. A new study published in the New England Journal of Medicine in February that tracked patients as long as 20 years shows that colonoscopy screening slashed the colorectal cancer death rate by more than 50 percent.

During National Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month, organizations across the country are holding events and sharing information about the disease, and are encouraging all men and women age 50 to 75 to have a screening test – usually a colonoscopy.

A colonoscopy involves examination of the colon and rectum using a camera-tipped instrument. This method can diagnose cancers early; the test also can prevent cancer from developing, by detecting and removing pre-cancerous polyps.

Though many people dread colonoscopies, with appropriate sedation they are relatively painless. And for people who aren’t at high risk, a colonoscopy every 10 years is sufficient, says Dr. Charles Fuchs, director of Dana-Farber’s Gastrointestinal Cancer Treatment Center. “Beyond our continuing efforts to define better treatments for patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer, we continue to focus on the importance of primary prevention through diet and exercise and early detection through regular screening colonoscopies.”

Here are just two leads researchers at the center are looking at:

  • It appears that patients who have high levels of vitamin D in their body are less likely to have recurrences of colorectal cancer. Dr. Kimmie Ng, a medical oncologist in the gastrointestinal cancer center, is leading what she says is the first randomized clinical trial to determine if boosting vitamin D levels with high doses of supplements can delay progression and lengthen survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. “There are several scientific and observational studies showing that vitamin D may have anti-tumor effects,” Ng says.
  • Physical exercise has also been shown to have benefits for colorectal cancer patients. There’s also evidence that metformin, a widely used diabetes drug, may have an anticancer effect. A new clinical trial led by gastrointestinal oncologist Dr. Jeffrey Meyerhardt, is testing a combination of metformin and exercise in patients at risk for recurrence of colorectal cancer following treatment with surgery, radiation or chemotherapy.

 

Share

From old drugs, new cancer treatments

When it comes to finding better drugs for cancer, Dana-Farber oncologist Dr. David Frank is not a patient man. While new cancer science promises to bring novel, improved therapies to the bedside, it can take many years — and Frank isn’t willing to wait.

“We need to get new treatments to patients as soon as possible,” he says. Read more

Share

When doctors encounter diseases without names

The complicated meaty machine that is the human body can break down in a remarkable variety of ways. The 9th edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9) includes more than 16,000 afflictions – everything from the bite of a venomous tropical millipede to injury by falling spacecraft debris.

With all of these dangers, it is truly a wonder that any of us can get out of bed in the morning. And yet any doctor who cares for patients knows that there are many other diseases that ICD-9 has never heard of – medical terra incognita, disorders that have yet to be defined or clearly described.

My colleagues and I are regularly asked to consult on patients with peculiar problems that don’t fit textbook depictions of any known disease, or where there is confusion because several similar diagnoses would fit equally well. Some of these patients have unusual manifestations of well-known medical conditions, but others may suffer from entirely new entities.

Lynne is one such patient with a murky malady. She’s a globetrotting academic whose frequent-flyer-mile accumulation rate dropped after she was diagnosed with an unusual form of anemia called sideroblastic anemia, which she could either have been born with or could have acquired.

Existing tests could not distinguish between these possibilities, and without knowing where the disease originated, no one could tell Lynne what to expect or predict how her condition might evolve.

When I first saw Lynne in Dana-Farber’s Center for Hematologic Oncology, she allowed me to save some extra cells from her blood and bone marrow for future research.

A few months later, at an international symposium in Scotland in May 2011, I heard a European scientist talk about a novel mutation in a gene called SF3B1 that she’d just found in blood cells from people with a form of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) that resembled Lynne’s condition.

When I got back to Boston, I called my friend Dr. Rafael Bejar, an extraordinarily talented scientist currently working in the laboratory of Dr. Ben Ebert at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. Raf had met Lynne and knew all the details of her problem. Raf said he could examine DNA from Lynne’s stored cells and look for this new mutation.

Raf found that Lynne’s blood cells have the most common (K700E) mutation in SF3B1, clearly identifying her condition as an unusual type of MDS called refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts. The rest of her cells have normal SF3B1, which meant she wasn’t born with this, and couldn’t have passed it on to her children. Some early reports suggest that this mutation confers a good prognosis.

Lynne was pleased to learn about the molecular clarification of her diagnosis, which we were able to tell her about months before the first papers on these mutations appeared in print in the journals Nature and The New England Journal of Medicine. It will likely be some time before any for-profit clinical lab offers testing for mutations in this gene.

Now we have assembled a collection of cells from other patients with unusual forms of anemia who don’t have SF3B1 or any other known mutation. In collaboration with Dr. Mark Fleming at Children’s Hospital Boston and several other researchers, we’re on the verge of defining several brand-new maladies at the molecular level.

I’ve worked previously at clinical institutions where parking was easier and my daily commute was less painful than it is now. Those hospitals were fantastic places in many respects. But the ability to collaborate with scientists just across the street who are of the caliber of Raf, Ben, and Mark – people who are both brilliant, and enthusiastic about studying patients with the same conditions that I want to understand better – was more limited there.

This is something unique about Dana-Farber: patients and their doctors have access to a vibrant cohort of scientific collaborators who are second to none in the world, who are making discoveries in real time and can bring a ray of light where there is darkness.

David P. Steensma, MD, FACP, is a physician in Dana-Farber’s Hematologic Oncology Treatment Center.

 

Share

Genetic counseling now recommended for children with sarcoma

Illustration of a treeIf your son or daughter has been diagnosed with a type of sarcoma – a tumor in connective tissue like muscles or bones – there are many questions: Will my child make a full recovery? What are the immediate and long-term side effects of treatment?

Most parents don’t consider whether their child will face a second cancer later in life.

However, a link between sarcomas and Li-Fraumeni syndrome, a rare condition that raises a person’s risk of developing one or more cancers to as high as 85 percent, has led genetic specialists at Dana-Farber/Children’s Hospital Cancer Center (DF/CHCC) to recommend that all child sarcoma patients be offered genetic counseling for Li-Fraumeni syndrome.  Read more

Share

The most talked about cancer stories of 2011

The face of cancer care in 2011 changed in encouraging and – in some cases – challenging ways. Here are some of the cancer stories that captured the most press attention in 2011.

  1.  A federal task force recommended against routine testing of healthy men for the prostate-specific antigen (PSA), which can be a sign of prostate cancer. However, Dana-Farber’s Philip Kantoff, MD, called the message “misguided” and said that oncologists are using the test to find those who may benefit from screening and treatment.

Read more

Share