PALB2 Breast Cancer Gene: What You Should Know

Medically Reviewed By: Judy E. Garber, MD, MPH

A relatively small proportion of breast cancers are caused by alterations in inherited genes that sharply increase the lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. One of these genes has recently been receiving new attention: PALB2, a potent breast cancer susceptibility gene related to the better-known BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes.

Someone who inherits a PALB2 mutation faces a 35% chance of developing breast cancer by age 70, and if she also has a strong family history of the disease, her risk is about 58% by age 70. Moreover, an inherited PALB2 mutation confers a somewhat increased risk of pancreatic cancer. Inheritance of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation confers about a six-fold higher risk — about 69% to 72% — of developing breast cancer, compared to a person without the mutation.

PALB2 was originally identified in the laboratory of Dana Farber professor David Livingston, and its clinical implications have since been studied by others at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.

What does PALB2 stand for?

PALB2 stands for Partner And Localizer of BRCA2 — or “PAL” of BRCA2 — for short. The PALB2 gene normally codes for a protein that interacts with the protein made by the BRCA2 gene. Together, the proteins make up part of the repair pathway that fixes DNA damage in cells. A mutation in any of these DNA repair genes prevents abnormal genes in cells from being fixed or eliminated, and those cells may grow uncontrollably to form tumors.

Who should be tested for PALB2?

PALB2 — sometimes referred to as BRCA3 — has been included since about 2012 in panels of multiple genes tested for inherited breast cancer susceptibility or more broadly for a wider range of cancer predisposition. Guidelines recommend testing for people with:

  • a personal history of breast cancer diagnosed before age 45, or
  • with recurrent or advanced disease where a finding of a mutation in BRCA1, BRCA2 or PALB2 could affect treatment options.

Testing is also offered to women with or without breast cancer themselves who have a family history of breast, ovarian, pancreatic or advanced prostate cancer.

People who had genetic testing before 2012, when only BRCA1 and BRCA2 could be analyzed, may want to have expanded testing to include more genes conferring risk of breast and ovarian cancer, at least. People who have had panels of multiple genes after 2012 almost certainly had PALB2 included in the list, which should be on the report.

What happens if I test positive for a PALB2 mutation?

Recommendations for people who test positive for PALB2 are similar to those who inherit a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation: annual MRIs alternating with mammograms — each once per year — with a clinical breast exam twice a year. A prophylactic mastectomy can also be an option.

The finding of a PALB2 mutation could affect treatment by adding the options of a PARP inhibitor or make patients eligible for certain clinical trials.

Awareness of PALB2

Many people who are now hearing about PALB2 may wonder if they were tested for it if they had breast cancer screening in the past.

“Anyone who has had multigene testing (that looks for mutations in several genes at once) since 2012 would have been tested for PALB2 as part of the assessment,” says Judy Garber, MD, MPH, chief of the Division for Cancer Genetics and Prevention at Dana-Farber, who was a researcher on a recent study that showed PALB2-related breast cancers are sensitive to treatment with PARP inhibitors, conducted at Dana-Farber and other sites. She adds, however, that if a person underwent genetic testing before 2012, they could consider having a newer, expanded test to make sure nothing was missed.

Garber says that some women might have chosen only to be tested for BRCA1 or BRCA2 because there was a history of that mutation in their family. 

Dana-Farber provides information and expert clinical care to patients with BRCA-related cancers through its Center for BRCA and Related Genes.

About the Medical Reviewer

Judy E. Garber, MD, MPH

Dr. Garber is the Susan F. Smith Chair and Chief of the Division of Cancer Genetics and Prevention at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and a Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School.  She conducts research in clinical cancer genetics, with a special focus in genetics of breast cancer.  Dr. Garber is also a leader in research into the characteristics and treatment of triple negative breast cancer, the most common form in women with BRCA1 mutations and an expert in Li-Fraumeni Syndrome.  Her translational research focuses on the evaluation of novel agents targeting DNA repair defects in breast cancer, including PARP inhibitors for treatment and prevention of breast cancer and other BRCA-associated cancers, and the study of other agents for reduction of breast cancer risk.


Dr. Garber is a past president of the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR).  She served on the National Cancer Advisory Board of the National Cancer Institute and was elected into the American Society of Clinical Investigation, the American Association of Physicians and the National Academy of Medicine.  She serves as the Scientific Director of the Breast Cancer Research Foundation and is a past chair of the Breast Cancer Research Foundation Scientific Advisory Board.  She is an ASCO Statesman and a Fellow of the AACR Academy, and was its first president.  

3 thoughts on “PALB2 Breast Cancer Gene: What You Should Know”

  1. Hi,
    I am a 3rd generation male member of a family carrying a BRACA 1 mutation. I am negative for the mutation as are my 2 daughters. Have you observed families expressing BRACA 1 mutations that also carry the PALB2 mutation?

    • Hi Daniel,

      Thank you for reading.

      Most families with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer will only have a mutation (pathogenic variant) is one gene associated with these cancers (for example, a BRCA1 mutation). Rarely, some families can have more than one gene mutation being passed down.

      In families undergoing testing today, even when the mutation in the family has been identified, we still test relatives through a large panel-based test. This more comprehensive approach to testing allows us to reassure individuals who test negative for the mutation known to be in the family, that their cancer risks are similar to risks of an average person.

      We hope this helps, and wish you all the best,

  2. Excellent article. I am not surprised that the PALB2 gene was originally identified in the laboratory of Dana Farber. Professor David Livingston, like all the others at Dana Farber are the “best of the best.” Great research is constantly taking place there. Since we can not fix or eliminate the abnormal gene, can we replace it with a normal one? Is research being conducted for that?

Comments are closed.